Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Structure?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Structure?

If you've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.

They are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could create issues for users.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can result in various potential problems, including an increased appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.


The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

Have you ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further the tower is.

Although this may sound like something that's good, the reality is that people who live close to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther far from antennas.

However, this study also revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin.  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  is crucial to know since the skin functions as a shield against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally,  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  is the largest organ of the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).

This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal and the effect of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.