If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. safe distance from cell tower appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.
They are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to many potential problems, including an increased appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
Have you ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest range from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the farther the tower is.
While this sounds like something that's good but the truth is that those living close to towers might be more prone to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
safe distance from cell tower is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, called the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body. It is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false belief that short-term exposures RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effect of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC limit the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs that are based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This could result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.