What is the safest distance from a 5G cell Tower system?

· 3 min read
What is the safest distance from a 5G cell Tower system?

If you've ever wandered through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still cause issues for users.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds



The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one Gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.

Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever operated a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther your location from the tower.

While it sounds like a good idea but the truth is that those living close to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who lived farther far from antennas.

But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a shield against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ of the human body and is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research.  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

what is a safe distance from a cell tower  does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effect of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.

Furthermore there is  safe distance from cell tower  that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This could result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.